<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can More Characters Help Monetize Twitter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adamcovati.com/social-networking/can-more-characters-help-monetize-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adamcovati.com/social-networking/can-more-characters-help-monetize-twitter/</link>
	<description>My thoughts as a Tech &#38; Product guy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 13:23:57 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://adamcovati.com/social-networking/can-more-characters-help-monetize-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamcovati.com/?p=170#comment-169</guid>
		<description>I think something gets overlooked, despite how many people may use a 3rd party application, SMS is still a big gateway for people to twitter. Considering that 160 characters is the norm for most SMS messages, with the limit of 140 it allows for a twitter update along with the username to come through in one message instead of a two part message.

Call my old school, or &quot;last year&quot; but I still like using SMS for my twitter updates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think something gets overlooked, despite how many people may use a 3rd party application, SMS is still a big gateway for people to twitter. Considering that 160 characters is the norm for most SMS messages, with the limit of 140 it allows for a twitter update along with the username to come through in one message instead of a two part message.</p>
<p>Call my old school, or &#8220;last year&#8221; but I still like using SMS for my twitter updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://adamcovati.com/social-networking/can-more-characters-help-monetize-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamcovati.com/?p=170#comment-142</guid>
		<description>@scott - I&#039;m aware of big tweet, it looks like a great app, and you&#039;re right, just the solution to this problem. I actually suggested that to Mike when we originally had this convo ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@scott &#8211; I&#8217;m aware of big tweet, it looks like a great app, and you&#8217;re right, just the solution to this problem. I actually suggested that to Mike when we originally had this convo ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Carter</title>
		<link>http://adamcovati.com/social-networking/can-more-characters-help-monetize-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamcovati.com/?p=170#comment-141</guid>
		<description>Adam - you can post 240 characters today to Twitter using BigTweet - http://bigtweet.com/

It breaks a larger post into two nicely formatted sequential tweets.  There is also a 140 character mode and lots of other features.  Installs quickly and easily on all the major browsers.

Scott
http://twitter.com/scott_carter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam &#8211; you can post 240 characters today to Twitter using BigTweet &#8211; <a href="http://bigtweet.com/" rel="nofollow">http://bigtweet.com/</a></p>
<p>It breaks a larger post into two nicely formatted sequential tweets.  There is also a 140 character mode and lots of other features.  Installs quickly and easily on all the major browsers.</p>
<p>Scott<br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/scott_carter" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/scott_carter</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Would You Pay for More Characters on Twitter? &#124; Microblink</title>
		<link>http://adamcovati.com/social-networking/can-more-characters-help-monetize-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Would You Pay for More Characters on Twitter? &#124; Microblink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamcovati.com/?p=170#comment-140</guid>
		<description>[...] already asked, &#8220;How much would you pay for Twitter?&#8220;, Adam Covati (@covati) is stirring the pot with a specific feature suggestion brought up by @mike9r that he feels people may get excited [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] already asked, &#8220;How much would you pay for Twitter?&#8220;, Adam Covati (@covati) is stirring the pot with a specific feature suggestion brought up by @mike9r that he feels people may get excited [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://adamcovati.com/social-networking/can-more-characters-help-monetize-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamcovati.com/?p=170#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Mike. I&#039;ll be sure to check out your post in the morning when my eyes work again. I&#039;ll get the other Mike to weigh in too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Mike. I&#8217;ll be sure to check out your post in the morning when my eyes work again. I&#8217;ll get the other Mike to weigh in too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Templeton</title>
		<link>http://adamcovati.com/social-networking/can-more-characters-help-monetize-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Templeton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamcovati.com/?p=170#comment-138</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always been in favor of a pro-version of Twitter that would allow for more functionality, but hadn&#039;t thought about an expanded character count as one of those features. The more I think about it, the more I actually like that idea. While Twitter has been built around the idea of 140 characters, it is frustrating when you&#039;ve got to go back and edit a few words down just to make the character cutoff.

I&#039;ve expanded a bit more in a post on Microblink so as not to clog up your comments:
http://microblink.com/2009/01/14/would-you-pay-for-more-characters-on-twitter/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always been in favor of a pro-version of Twitter that would allow for more functionality, but hadn&#8217;t thought about an expanded character count as one of those features. The more I think about it, the more I actually like that idea. While Twitter has been built around the idea of 140 characters, it is frustrating when you&#8217;ve got to go back and edit a few words down just to make the character cutoff.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve expanded a bit more in a post on Microblink so as not to clog up your comments:<br />
<a href="http://microblink.com/2009/01/14/would-you-pay-for-more-characters-on-twitter/" rel="nofollow">http://microblink.com/2009/01/14/would-you-pay-for-more-characters-on-twitter/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

